Recognizing the Power of Food Addiction

by Nora on October 2, 2011

Recently during a coaching session I was asked to name the one thing that helped me the most toward my recovery from food addiction. First, let me say that I’m not there yet.  However, unlike most raw foodists, I have a pretty good idea where I was when I started, how far I’ve come, and how far I still need to go.  Also unlike most raw fooders, I’m okay with not having crossed the finish line already. More about that later.

The way I answered the question was to say that my “crises” are what really forced me to take my eating choices seriously. For example, 3 years ago an extremely painful inflamed tooth (actually the gum surrounding it) forced me to give up nuts. I had been eating them a few times per week (an ounce or two each time) for years and when I stopped, the tooth pain stopped too. After the pain went away, I started back up eating nuts, and my tooth pain came back. I never ate nuts again, and my tooth pain never came back. Fast forward 3 years and I had more or less replaced nuts with the occasional frozen durian. Except that, “occasional” became more and more frequent, until I had a week this last May when I ate 4 durians over a 5-day period. The accumulated consequence of that particular bad habit was 3 weeks of “flu”-like symptoms, including extreme weakness, chest and head congestion and very high fever. Of course after it was all over, the need for durian was gone and I now feel better than I’ve ever felt in my life, on a fairly predictable and even basis.

The point of explaining the above is to illustrate that my habits were so reinforced by the time I went raw (age 44) that changing them voluntarily just wasn’t in the cards. For me it worked best to improve my diet just enough to allow slow healing, which resulted in gradually increasing sensitivity/vitality, from which the ‘healing events’ (like the tooth inflammation 3 years ago, and the ‘flu’ this past June) eventually and periodically emerged to motivate even greater refinements. Actually what happened is things just piled up until my body was forced to institute extraordinary symptoms to rid itself of the excess.

Even though it’s true that this is the mechanism that forced me off my periodic dietary plateaus, however, I would have answered the question differently if I’d thought about it more first.

Without doubt the one intellectual idea I’ve LEARNED that helped me the most is that food addiction is an extremely powerful force. When people want to escape other addictions in our culture, they can get help. There exists a social safety net for people who recognize the harm of continuing to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, take drugs, gamble, shop or even have sex compulsively. But there’s no help for food addiction recovery. There might be some lip service given to the problem as it relates to hard core compulsives, but if you really understand what garden variety food addiction is and go looking for help, you soon realize that nobody’s REALLY tackling it, and I mean NOBODY. Even so called food-addiction experts are food addicts in deep, deep denial.

Added to that is the fact that addiction to food is every bit as physiologically-centered and physically damaging as any other addiction. It might take 30-50 years to kill a person, typically, but it does kill. It needs to be taken seriously, and its power needs to be respected. The consequences of not doing so are what causes so many raw fooders to fail. People think it’s just a matter of ‘will power’, and that it can be approached like any other problem – in the head first, then followed through in practice. However, it’s the extremely rare person who can recognize all his/her dietary issues at once and then get rid of them overnight. In fact, it’s impossible. Virtually everyone who tries it not only meets with failure, but a great deal of demoralization and self-recrimination as well.

When overnight change is attempted, people not only typically fail, but in practical terms, they become confused and lose their sense of direction. They feel that they can’t move forward, but they can’t go all the way back to their previous eating habits either.

Slow transitional changes, on the other hand, give people something to fall back on at each stage, if/when they realize a little compromise is needed. This allows gradual, gentle and graceful forward progress.

The challenge of slow improvement, however, is that you have to learn how to deal with the conflict that arises from not instituting ALL the changes at once that you know are necessary to enjoy peak health. In other words, self-forgiveness.

Self forgiveness is the biggest challenge by far for the type of people that the low fat high fruit lifestyle seems to attract (Type “A”s, perfectionists), and it’s the one that most people don’t manage to pull off. Instead they go too fast, then they backslide, then they make that same mistake over and over. It happens much more in the high fruit camp than among the high fat crowd, because people in the latter group tend to go much slower. I don’t think they realize it necessarily, but they have the tools to take their addictions seriously – namely, foods that allow a certain amount of healing (by virtue of the improvement they represent) and also keep them emotionally satisfied. Unfortunately people using that approach tend to stay in transitionland forever, not realizing it’s not the finish line.

For some reason, high fruit eaters tend to be very competitive. They regard the high fat, complicated-recipe approach to dietary transition to be indulgent and less self-disciplined. But in reality, both approaches can lead a person to a kind of health purgatory, where forward movement is either restrained or nonexistent, and the need for compromise is either overindulged or completely denied.  In high fat raw fooders, it means eating the same miscombined and questionable transition foods forever. In high fruit eaters, it means bouncing back and forth between “optimal” and the old way of eating, regardless of what that was.

There’s a way to transition that offers the best of both worlds, and at its foundation is an UNDERSTANDING of the incredible power of the foe we’re all up against: food addiction. No military strategist ever won a battle by underestimating the enemy, and the same goes for transitioning raw fooders.

To your health,

Nora

 

{ 2 comments }

Are Humans Natural Water Drinkers?

by Nora on September 27, 2011

Recently a question about water drinking was posed on my public forum, and I thought the answer might make a good blog topic.  Basically, the inquirer wanted to know if humans are naturally adapted to water drinking, since he’d heard of raw fooders giving up or cutting back on the water they drink, and he himself had noticed he had less desire to drink water as he has . 
 
The popularity and necessity of drinking water arose as we (humans) started taking water out of our foods, and eating the wrong ones.  Humans are not natural water drinkers.  Even if we make a drinking vessel out of our cupped hands, it flows through the cracks and our noses get in the way.  It can be done, obviously, but it’s more of an emergency device.  Drinking water is not awkward for species who are biologically adapted for it.  They have natural equipment that makes it effortless and efficient. 
 
I attended a class at Woodstock by Robert Lockhart on the topic of dry fasting.  He said that water drinking slows down cleansing during a fast, and that a fast is always more powerful when water is not drunk.  For this reason it is not for people who are new to fasting, or are coming from an unhealthy lifestyle.  Just water fasting is generally enough of a challenge for them (as it still is for me!)  He also said it can be dangerous if a person tries it after having been on drugs because the body may not have sufficient fluid reserves to dilute those harmful substances as they are liberated back into the bloodstream for eventual elimination.
 
The reason why dehydration is so feared in the cooked world is because people who eat the conventional diet require a lot of extra water and quickly become dehydrated when they don’t get it.  That’s why they’re always holding a container of some kind or offering each other something to drink.  It’s also where the idea comes from that people can only survive 7-8 days without water.  I think Robert Lockhart mentioned that he’d fasted for 9 days with no water, and the record is much longer. 
 
Water drinking temporarily turns off the unpleasant symptoms we experience when fasting, and that’s why it’s so popular among fasters.  Practitioners encourage it for the most part because they don’t know exactly how toxic their patients are, so there is the legitimate need to ‘manage’ the outflow of toxins.  But the idea that we need to drink in advance or in the absence of thirst, even while fasting, is just plain crazy.  Thirst is a perfectly reliable indicator of the body’s water needs.  If it wasn’t, our species wouldn’t be here.
 
Personally, I don’t drink much water anymore.  I used to have to drink water first thing on waking in the morning, but I find that I now go hours without wanting a sip.  I expect I’ll continue to drink less and less as time goes on. 
 
Nora

{ 7 comments }

Free Coaching this Sunday, September 25, 2011 for Web Feed Members

September 19, 2011

Hello fellow raw fooders and aspiring health seekers! As a special “thank you” to all of you who’ve signed up to be notified when the RawSchool blog is updated (and a lesson to those who haven’t that you might be missing out on something good:)), I’ll be offering FREE coaching this Sunday, September 25. Here’s [...]

Read the full article →

Do We Need to Eat Greens?

September 19, 2011

Recently at the Woodstock Fruit Festival, I attended a class entitled “Do Raw Fooders Need to Eat Greens?”, hoping that the instructor, (who I knew to be hygiene-friendly) would answer the question using factual evidence and common sense rather than the normal speculation and fear-mongering.  I was disappointed.  Although the speaker acknowledged that the taste buds are the sentinels [...]

Read the full article →

Radio Interview

September 13, 2011

I was interviewed last week on a local (Seattle) radio show about dogs.  The information is focussed on dogs and dog nutrition, but there was a great deal of discussion around the principles of natural hygiene and the importance of removing the cause of disease rather than covering it up with herbs, supplements, drugs or [...]

Read the full article →

More Calorie Fallacies, Overeating and Weight Loss Frustration

August 29, 2011

Since I wrote my blog post about the fallacies of the calorie theory, I’ve encountered a few people who are frustrated because they fail to reach their weight loss goals on a low fat raw food diet.  The latest of these was a contributor on a raw vegan forum who posted that even though he worked out [...]

Read the full article →

Calorie Theory Deeply Flawed

August 15, 2011

It is a testament to the dark age we live in that the calorie system is regarded as the best measuring system we have for figuring the fuel value of foods. If any other measuring device of use in modern civilization was as flawed, inaccurate and unreliable as the calorie system, we wouldn’t be able to [...]

Read the full article →

Interview

August 12, 2011

Hello, I was interviewed by someone from another raw food website a couple years ago, and since that particular website seems to no longer be in existence I thought I would post this here, in case it might be helpful to someone, and to serve as a temporary update to my raw transition story, which hasn’t been officially [...]

Read the full article →